The “Life” in the Living Law
Law, Emotion and Landscape
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19184/csi.v1i2.25443Abstract
This article explores the concept of ‘living law’ from a spatio-temporal and emotional perspective. Understood as a dynamic and interactive process, living law shapes and reproduces the concepts of law, emotion, and landscape. Based on the semantic findings in decency-related court decisions, this article argues that sensing the living law is to be understood as seeing the physical legal landscape, believing emotional common sense, and anticipating guided by communitarian atmosphere. The daily (legal) experiences captured in case-law are, essentially, assemblages of various meanings and spaces tied up homogeneously in an ideologically manner. Through this examination, living law appears increasingly complex, unstable, and non-linear, especially in terms of its performativity. Law has the potential not only to facilitate social transformation but can negatively impact vulnerable groups.
Keywords: Emotion, Landscape, Living Law, Performativity
Downloads
References
Althusser, Louis, On the Reproduction of Capitalism: Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses
(London: Verso, 2014).
Banakar, Reza, Normativity in Legal Sociology: Methodological Reflections on Law and Regulation
in Late Modernity (London: Springer, 2015).
Davies, Margaret, Law Unlimited: Materialism, Pluralism, and Legal Theory (New York:
Routledge, 2017).
Deflem, Mathieu, Sociology of law: Visions of a scholarly tradition (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2008).
Delaney, David, The Spatial, the Legal and the Pragmatics of World-Making: Nomospheric
Investigation (New York: Routledge, 2010).
Ehrlich, Eugen, Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law (London, New York:
Routledge, 2002).
Kusno, Abidin, After the new order: Space, politics, and Jakarta (University of Hawaii Press,
2013).
Olwig, Kenneth R, The meanings of landscape: Essays on place, space, environment and justice
(Oxon, New York: Routledge, 2019).
Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, Andreas, Spatial Justice: Body, Lawscape, Atmosphere (New York: Routledge, 2015).
Soesilo, R, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) serta Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap
Pasal Demi Pasal (Bogor: Politeia, 2013).
Valverde, Mariana, Chronotopes of law: Jurisdiction, scale and governance (Oxon, New York:
Routledge, 2015).
Azuela, Antonio & Rodrigo Meneses-Reyes, “The everyday formation of the urban
space: Law and poverty in Mexico City” in Irus Braverman et al, eds, Expand Spaces
Law A Timely Leg Geogr (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2015) 167.
Bandes, Susan A & Jeremy A Blumenthal, “Emotion and the law” (2012) 8:May Annu
Rev Law Soc Sci 161–181.
Barad, Karen, “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter
Comes to Matter” (2003) 28:3 Signs J Women Cult Soc 801–831.
Benda-Beckmann, Franz von & Keebet von Benda-Beckmann, “Places that come and go:
A legal anthropological perspective on the temporalities of space in plural legal
orders” in Irus Braverman et al, eds, Expand Spaces Law A Timely Leg Geogr (Stanford,
CA: Stanford University Press, 2014) 30.
———, “The Social Life of Living Law in Indonesia” in Marc Hertogh, ed, Living Law
Reconsidering Eugen Ehrlich (Oxford, Portland: Hart Publishing, 2009) 177.
Benda-Beckmann, Franz von, Keebet von Benda-Beckmann & Anne Griffiths, “Space
and legal pluralism: An introduction” in Franz von Benda-Beckmann, Keebet von
Benda-Beckmann & Anne Griffiths, eds, Spat law An Anthropol Geogr law Soc (Surrey:
Ashgate, 2009) 1.
Bennett, Luke & Antonia Layard, “Legal Geography: Becoming Spatial Detectives”
(2015) 9:7 Geogr Compass 406–422.
Braverman, Irus et al, “Expanding the Spaces of Law” in Expand Spaces Law A Timely Leg
Geogr (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2014) 1.
Buana, Mirza Satria, “Living adat Law, Indigenous Peoples and the State Law: A
Complex Map of Legal Pluralism in Indonesia” (2016) 1:3 Int J Indones Stud 104–
119.
Butler, Judith, “Performativity, precarity and sexual politics” (2009) 4:3 AIBR Rev
Antropol Iberoam.
Conway, Heather & John Stannard, “Contextualising Law and Emotion: Past
Narratives and Future Directions” in Heather Conway & John Stannard, eds, Emot
Dyn Law Leg Discourse (Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2016) 1.
Davies, Margaret, “The Law Becomes Us: Rediscovering Judgment” (2012) 20 Fem Leg
Stud 167–181.
Delaney, David, “Legal geography I: Constitutivities, complexities, and contingencies”
(2015) 39:1 Prog Hum Geogr 96–102.
———, “Seeing seeing seeing the legal landscape” in Nuala C Johnson, Richard H
Schein & Jamie Winders, eds, Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Cult Geogr (West Sussex:
Wiley Blackwell, 2013) 238.
Desautels-Stein, Justin & Akbar Rasulov, “Deep Cuts: Four Critiques of Legal Ideology”
(2021) 31:2 Yale J Law Humanit 436–519.
Gendron, Maria, “The evolving neuroscience of emotion: challenges and opportunities
for integration with the law” in Susan A Bandes et al, eds, Res Handb Law Emot
(Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021) 27.
Golubchikov, Oleg, “The urbanization of transition: ideology and the urban experience”
(2016) 57:4–5 Eurasian Geogr Econ 607–623.
Goonewardena, Kanishka, “The urban sensorium: Space, ideology and the
aestheticization of politics” (2005) 37:1 Antipode 46–71.
Grossi, Renata, “Understanding law and emotion” (2015) 7:1 Emot Rev 55–60.
Haidt, Jonathan, “The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach
to moral judgment” (2001) 108:4 Psychol Rev 814.
Hexagraha, Shafira Anindia Alif, “Trajektori ko-produksi kota di Indonesia: Telaah
geografi kritis” (2018) 5:1 J Huk Lingkung 88–116.
Hexagraha, Shafira Anindia Alif & Savitri Nur Setyorini, “Tinjauan terhadap Konsep
Keadilan Spasial dan Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Perencanaan dan Pengendalian
Pemanfaatan Ruang pada Program Normalisasi Ciliwung di Provinsi DKI Jakarta”
(2019) 49:2 J Huk Pembang 349–375.
Hunt, Alan, “The Ideology of Law : Advances and Problems in Recent Applications of
the Concept of Ideology to the Analysis of Law” (1985) 19:1 Law Soc Rev 11–37.
Iskandar, Pranoto, “The Pancasila Delusion” (2016) 46:4 J Contemp Asia 723–735.
Kahan, Dan M & Martha C Nussbaum, “Two conceptions of emotion in criminal law”
(1996) 96:2 Columbia Law Rev 269–374.
Latour, Bruno, “The Strange Entanglement of Jurimorphs” in Kyle McGee, ed, Latour
Passage Law (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2015) 331.
Lev, Daniel S, “Colonial Law and the Genesis of the Indonesian State” (1985) 40
Indonesia 57–74.
Manullang, E Fernando M, “Mempertanyakan Pancasila sebagai Grundnorm: Suatu
Refleksi Kritis dalam Perspektif Fondasionalisme” (2020) 50:2 J Huk Pembang
284–301.
———, “The Purpose of Law, Pancasila, and Legality According to Ernst Utrect: A
Critical Reflection” (2015) 5:2 Indones Law Rev 187–207.
Maroney, Terry A, “Law and emotion: A proposed taxonomy of an emerging field”
(2006) 30:2 Law Hum Behav 119–142.
———, “Lay conceptions of emotion in law” in Susan A Bandes et al, eds, Res Handb law
Emot (Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021) 15.
McGee, Kyle, “On Devices and Logics of Legal Sense: Toward Socio-technical Legal
Analysis” in Kyle McGee, ed, Latour Passage Law (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University
Press, 2015) 61.
McGregor, Katharine E, “Commemoration of 1 October, ‘Hari Kesaktian Pancasila’: a
post mortem analysis?” (2002) 26:1 Asian Stud Rev 39–72.
Morfit, Michael, “Pancasila: The Indonesian State Ideology According to the New
Order Government” (1981) 21:8 Asian Surv 838–851.
Nalle, Victor Imanuel, “Pendekatan Geografi Hukum Kritis dalam Kajian Hukum Tata
Ruang Indonesia: Sebuah Wacana Filsafat Hukum dan Interdisiplin” (2021) 37:1
Justitia Pax J Huk 61–83.
Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, Andreas, “Atmospheres of law: Senses, affects,
lawscapes” (2013) 7:1 Emot Sp Soc 35–44.
Rannila, Päivi & Siiri Pyykkönen, “Public obscenity and the formation of emotional
legal landscapes in Dries Verhoeven’s Ceci n’est pas ...” (2020) 102:4 Geogr Ann Ser
B, Hum Geogr 384–399.
Salampessy, M Yahdi, “Book Review The Leiden Legacy: Concepts of Law in Indonesia”
(2014) 4:3 Indones Law Rev 385–388.
Umphrey, Martha M, “Law in Drag: Trials and Legal Performativity” (2012) 21:2
Columbia J Gend Law 114–129.
Yulius, Hendri, “Double standards: The defining of homosexuality as pornographic in
Indonesia”, Jakarta Post (21 October 2016), online:
<https://www.thejakartapost.com/academia/2016/10/21/double-standards-thedefining-
of-homosexuality-as-pornographic-in-indonesia.html.>.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Harison Citrawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
