Buying Voters

Money and Political Transaction in Legislative Elections

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19184/csi.v1i1.21508

Abstract

Political transaction has become a common phenomenon that accompanies elections. It does not only occur in countries with well-established democratic systems, but also in developing nations. Academic engagement with the concept of democracy increasingly explores its links to the chaotic commodification of electors' votes. Political transactions can trigger several problems, such as political structures, citizenship awareness, or cultural relations issues that form a democratic structure of the country. Political transactions are processes of negotiation that take place between elites. This paper explores the contestation of social positions to gain electors' votes in the context of the legislative election conducted in Banyuwangi. The strategies used by legislative candidates to obtain votes through transactional relationships demonstrates the various actors involved in general elections. First, the researcher argues that democratization has transformed the sacred position of the elites, especially the religious elite. Second, the complexity of relations between elites presents the position of a broker, which emphasizes the character of democracy in Indonesia, which is marked by issues of clientelism. Thus, it is essential to observe Indonesia's political praxis from the institutional practice point of view and its social problems that distort democratic values.

Keywords: Clientelism, Transaction Cost Politic, Money Politics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abente Brun, Diego, dan Larry Diamond. (2014). Clientisme Social Policy and the Quality of

Democracy. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

Abenza, O. A. (2015). The Public Choice Theory, and its capacity to explain unpopular

Nationalist policy decisions. Global Diplomacy – ‘Global Public Policy,’ August, 1–6.

Aminuddin, M. Faishal, dan Natasha Hassan Attamimi. (2019). From Retail to Grocery:

Money Politics in 2014 Indonesian Legislative Election. Politik Indonesia:

Indonesian Political Science Review 4, no. 1: 99–120.

https://doi.org/10.15294/ipsr.v4i1.12609.

Amrullah, M. A. (2009). Korupsi, Politik dan Pilkada dalam Perspektif Pemberantasan

Korupsi di Indonesia. [Corruption, Politics And Pilkadal In The Perspective Of

Corruption Eradication In Indonesia] Syiar Hukum, 11(3), 271–283.

Aspinall, Edward, dan Ward Berenschot. (2019). Democracy For Sale, Elections, Clientilism,

and the State in Indonesia. Itha: Cornell University Press.

Brinkerhoff, D., & Goldsmith, A. (2002). Clientelism, Patrimonialism and Democratic

Governance: An Overview and Framework for Assessment and Planning.

Caporaso, J. A., & Levine, D. P. (1992). Theories of Political Economy. Cambridge

University Press.

Diego Abente Brun, L. D. (Ed.). (2014). Clientisme Social Policy and the Quality of Democracy.

John Hopkins University Press.

Edward Aspinall, W. B. (2019). Democracy For Sale, Elections, Clientilism, and the State in

Indonesia. Cornell University Press.

Henisz, W. J., & Zelner, B. A. (2004). Explicating political hazards and safeguards : a

transaction cost politics approach. 13(6), 901–915. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth036

Irham, M. A. (2016). Korupsi Demokratis dalam Partai Politik: Studi Kasus

Penyelenggaraan Pemilukada Lampung. [Democratic Corruption in Political

Parties: A Case Study on the Implementation of the Lampung Pemilukada]

MASYARAKAT: Jurnal Sosiologi, 21(1), 35–56.

M. Faishal Aminuddi, N. H. A. (2019). From Retail to Grocery : Money Politics in 2014

Indonesian Legislative Election. Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review,

4(January), 99–120.

Muhtadi, B. (2013). Politik Uang Dan Dinamika Elektoral Di Indonesia : Sebuah Kajian Awal

Interaksi Antara M Oney Politics And Electoral Dynamics In Indonesia. [Money bPolitics

And Electrical Dynamics In Indonesia: An Initial Study Of Interaction

Between M Oney Politics And Electoral Dynamics In Indonesia] 41–57.

Muhtadi, B. (2013) “Politik Uang dan Dinamika Elektoral di Indonesia: Sebuah Kajian

Awal Interaksi antara ‘Party-ID’ dan Patron-Klien” [Money Politics and Electoral

Dynamics in Indonesia: An Early Study of the Interaction between 'Party-ID' and

Patron-Client]. 10: 41–58.

Oktavinanda, P. A. (2012). Public Choice Theory dan Aplikasinya dalam Sistem Legislasi

Indonesia. [Public Choice Theory and Its Application in Indonesian Legislation

System]. 1–24.

Prihadi, S. D. (2015). YouTube dalam Angka-Angka. CNN Indonesia.

https://www.cnnindonesia.com/teknologi/20150214143544-185-32127/youtubedalam-

angka-angka

Rachbini, D. J. (2002). Ekonomi Politik: Paradigma dan Teori Pilihan Publik. [Political

economy: paradigms and theories of public choice] Ghalia Indonesia.

Schofi, N., Daniel, C., Editors, K., Schofeldi, N., & Caballero, G. (Eds.). (2013). Advances

in Political Economy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35239-3

Sofia, A. (2015). Evaluation of Election Cost-Value for Money Based Toward Good Government

Governance. Isclo, 126–131.

Várdy, Felix, dan John Morgan. (2006). Corruption, Competition, and Contracts: A

Model of Vote Buying. IMF Working Papers 06, no. 11.

https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451862713.001.

Yustika, A. E. (2008). Krisis Ekonomi, Kontestasi Politik, dan Proyeksi Ekonomi 2009.

[Financial crisis, political contestation, and economic prospects 2009: Indonesia's

economic projections, 2009.] Disunting oleh INDEF (Organization). Jakarta:

INDEF.

Downloads

Published

2021-02-03