Spare the Rod, Spoil the Society? The Moral Complexity of Caning in Singapore

Hannah Sorenson

doi:10.19184/csi.v1i1.21506

Authors

Hannah Sorenson St. Olaf College, United States of America

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19184/csi.v1i1.21506

Abstract

You have the opportunity to decide whether or not a person gets caned, the only caveat is that they have committed a crime against you. What will you do? This essay explores the moral complexity of caning in Singapore through an exploration of corporal punishment, criminal justice, moral philosophy, and the Asian values debate; a dilemma that ultimately places concerns of society and the individual at odds. In doing so, the essay argues that the morality of caning changes on the basis of the ethical framework and modification of situation variables. Even so, the moral complexity of caning is not superficially evident. In order to thoroughly engage with all elements of this complexity, this essay begins by attempting to decipher the place of punishment within international human rights frameworks. From there, the essay explores the morality of punishment and its employ in colonial endeavors. This leads to a discussion of modernization, humanitarian ideologies, and control. By creating a framework for analyzing criminal justice in Singaporeâ€”including an outline of the intersections of criminal justice, development, and prosperity â€”this essay seeks to explore the balance between corporal punishment as a tool of prosperity and corporal punishment as a source of pain and degradation. When placed in consequentialist and virtue-based ethical frameworks caning in Singapore looks very different, forcing the moral actor to weigh societal concerns with concerns for individual pain, suffering, and liberties.

Keywords: Caning, Morality, Society, Punishment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adler, S. A., & Moi, K. E. (2011). Educating Citizens : A Cross-Cultural Conversation. Journal of International Social Studies, 1(2), 2–20.

Amirthalingam, K. (2013). Criminal Justice and Diversionary Programs in Singapore. Criminal Law Forum, 24, 527–559. https://search.proquest.com/docview/%0A1992037536?accountid=351 %0A

Amirthalingam, K. (2017). The Importance of Criminal Law. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 318–328. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1461628691?accountid=351

Athanassoulis, N. (n.d.). Virtue Ethics. The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved October 30, 2018, from https://iep.utm.edu/virtue/

Bary, W. T. de. (2004). Nobility and Civility. Harvard University Press.

Chan, W.-C. (2013). Family Conferencing for Juvenile Offenders: A Singaporean Case Study in Restorative Justice. Asian Journal of Criminology, 8(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-011-9122-y

Engle Merry, S. (2006). Human Rights & Gender Violence. University of Chicago Press.

Haines, W. (n.d.). Consequentialism. The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved November 10, 2018, from https://iep.utm.edu/conseque/

Lum, S. (2015). Caning of Prisoners is Constitutional, Court of Appeal Rules. The Straits Times.

https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.stolaf.edu/docview/1660636165%0A?accountid=351%0A

Mahbubani, K. (1998). Can Asians Think? Time Books International.

Morris, H. (1968). Persons and Punishment. The Monist, 52, 641–654.

Murtagh, K. (n.d.). Punishment. The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved October 30, 2018, from https://www.iep.utm.edu/punishme/

Nations, U. (2018a). Human Development Indices and Indicators. In 2018 Statistical Update. New York: United Nations Development Programme. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/%0Ahuman-development-indices-indicators-2018-statistical-update%0A

Nations, U. (2018b). United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner: Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/cat.aspx

Nations, U. (2018c). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/

Pierce, S. (2006). Flogging in Northern Nigeria. In In Discipline and the Other Body (pp. 186–214).

Pierce, S., & Rao, A. (2006). Discipline and the Other Body: Correction, Corporeality, Colonialism. Duke University Press.

Rajah, J. (2011). Punishing Bodies, Securing the Nation: How Rule of Law Can Legitimate the Urbane Authoritarian State. Law & Social Inquiry 36, No. 4 (Fall).

Rao, A. (2006). Torture in Colonial India (P. Steven Rao & Anupama (Eds.); In Discipl). Duke University Press.

Research, W. C. P. (n.d.). Judicial Caning in Singapore, Malaysia and Brunei. World Corporal Punishment Research. Retrieved November 2, 2018, from https://www.corpun.com/singfeat.htm#history

Reynolds, Z. (2017). Intertwining public morality prosecutorial discretion and punishment: Low crime and convictions in Singapore. International Immersion Program Papers. http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/international_immersion_program_papers/61

Ter Haar, G. (2003). Rats, Cockroaches, and People like Us. In J. Runzo, N. M. Martin, & A. Sharma (Eds.), In Human Rights and Responsibilities in the World Religions. Oxford: Oneworld.

Watch, H. R. (2018). Singapore. Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/world%0A-report2018/country-chapters/singapore#%0A

Westacott, E. (n.d.). Moral Relativism. The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://www.iep.utm.edu/moral-re/